EGF-01060 Yellow

CC1C=C2C(C#N)C(=N)N(c3cc(Cl)c(Cl)c(Cl)c3)C2(O)C(C)O1
0.451
Platform Score
2D Structure
EGF-01060
C16H14Cl3N3O2 | Exact mass: 385.0152
Key Metrics
-6.6
Vina (kcal/mol)
#3426
Docking Rank
0
Hinge Binder
80
TPSA
387
MW
2
HBD
4.0
SlogP
Display Controls





EGFR Docking Result
-6.61
kcal/mol (molecular docking)
Docking Rank#3426 of 1,249
Consensus Score-
ReceptorEGFR (PDB: 1M17)
Selective No
Selectivity Profile
ADMET Profile
BBB (BOILED-Egg) BBB- (non-penetrant)
ADMET Status Pass (no hard fails)
CNS Drug-Likeness
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Weight386.70 Da
TPSA80.3 A^2
HBD2
HBA4
SlogP4.01
Fsp30.375
Rotatable Bonds1
Rings3 (1 aromatic)
QED0.564
SA Score4.81 (1=easy, 10=hard)
CNS MPO- / 4.0
FormulaC16H14Cl3N3O2
Exact Mass385.0152
Classification
Scaffold (Murcko)-
Source Versions-
Best Source Score-
Best Source Rank#-
Hinge Binder Not present
InChIKey-
Filter PassYes
Retrosynthetic Analysis

Retrosynthetic analysis not yet run for this compound.

About

Retrosynthetic analysis decomposes the target molecule into purchasable building blocks using learned reaction templates.

A feasible route means the molecule can theoretically be synthesized from commercially available starting materials.

Min steps indicates the shortest synthesis route found.

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis

Find structural transformations that improve BBB penetration by analyzing pairs of similar molecules with different predictions.

About MMP

Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) are pairs of molecules that differ by a single structural transformation.

By comparing BBB predictions across many such pairs, we identify systematic SAR rules — specific modifications that consistently improve or reduce BBB penetration.

Suggestions are based on transformations observed in similar molecules within the compound library.

Patent Landscape Screening

Screen this compound against global patent databases (SureChEMBL + PubChem).

About IP Screening

Searches performed:

  • Exact structure match (SureChEMBL)
  • Substructure / Markush coverage
  • Similarity search (70% Tanimoto)
  • PubChem patent annotations

Risk levels:

  • CRITICAL Exact match in active patent
  • HIGH Substructure / Markush hit
  • MODERATE High similarity (>85%)
  • LOW Moderate similarity
  • CLEAR No hits found
Disclaimer: This is a computational screening tool only. It does not constitute legal advice. 18-month publication lag means recent filings may not appear. Consult qualified IP counsel for formal FTO opinions.