EGF-02262 Yellow

O=C1COc2cc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccc(S(=O)(=O)N4CCOCC4)cc3)c(Cl)cc2N1
0.438
Platform Score
2D Structure
EGF-02262
C18H18ClN3O7S2 | Exact mass: 487.0275
Key Metrics
-7.6
Vina (kcal/mol)
#1294
Docking Rank
0
Hinge Binder
131
TPSA
488
MW
2
HBD
1.5
SlogP
Display Controls





EGFR Docking Result
-7.61
kcal/mol (molecular docking)
Docking Rank#1294 of 1,249
Consensus Score-
ReceptorEGFR (PDB: 1M17)
Selective No
Selectivity Profile
ADMET Profile
BBB (BOILED-Egg) BBB- (non-penetrant)
ADMET Status Pass (no hard fails)
CNS Drug-Likeness
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Weight487.90 Da
TPSA131.1 A^2
HBD2
HBA7
SlogP1.49
Fsp30.278
Rotatable Bonds5
Rings4 (2 aromatic)
QED0.653
SA Score2.47 (1=easy, 10=hard)
CNS MPO- / 4.0
FormulaC18H18ClN3O7S2
Exact Mass487.0275
Classification
Scaffold (Murcko)-
Source Versions-
Best Source Score-
Best Source Rank#-
Hinge Binder Not present
InChIKey-
Filter PassYes
Retrosynthetic Analysis

Retrosynthetic analysis not yet run for this compound.

About

Retrosynthetic analysis decomposes the target molecule into purchasable building blocks using learned reaction templates.

A feasible route means the molecule can theoretically be synthesized from commercially available starting materials.

Min steps indicates the shortest synthesis route found.

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis

Find structural transformations that improve BBB penetration by analyzing pairs of similar molecules with different predictions.

About MMP

Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) are pairs of molecules that differ by a single structural transformation.

By comparing BBB predictions across many such pairs, we identify systematic SAR rules — specific modifications that consistently improve or reduce BBB penetration.

Suggestions are based on transformations observed in similar molecules within the compound library.

Patent Landscape Screening

Screen this compound against global patent databases (SureChEMBL + PubChem).

About IP Screening

Searches performed:

  • Exact structure match (SureChEMBL)
  • Substructure / Markush coverage
  • Similarity search (70% Tanimoto)
  • PubChem patent annotations

Risk levels:

  • CRITICAL Exact match in active patent
  • HIGH Substructure / Markush hit
  • MODERATE High similarity (>85%)
  • LOW Moderate similarity
  • CLEAR No hits found
Disclaimer: This is a computational screening tool only. It does not constitute legal advice. 18-month publication lag means recent filings may not appear. Consult qualified IP counsel for formal FTO opinions.