EGF-02606 Yellow

O=S(=O)(c1ccc(Br)cc1)N1Cc2ccc(C(F)(F)F)nc2Nc2ccccc21
0.454
Platform Score
2D Structure
EGF-02606
C19H13BrF3N3O2S | Exact mass: 482.9864
Key Metrics
-5.3
Vina (kcal/mol)
#4859
Docking Rank
1
Hinge Binder
62
TPSA
484
MW
1
HBD
5.3
SlogP
Display Controls





EGFR Docking Result
-5.29
kcal/mol (molecular docking)
Docking Rank#4859 of 1,249
Consensus Score-
ReceptorEGFR (PDB: 1M17)
Selective No
Selectivity Profile
ADMET Profile
BBB (BOILED-Egg) BBB- (non-penetrant)
ADMET Status Pass (no hard fails)
CNS Drug-Likeness
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Weight484.30 Da
TPSA62.3 A^2
HBD1
HBA4
SlogP5.32
Fsp30.105
Rotatable Bonds2
Rings4 (3 aromatic)
QED0.536
SA Score2.59 (1=easy, 10=hard)
CNS MPO- / 4.0
FormulaC19H13BrF3N3O2S
Exact Mass482.9864
Classification
Scaffold (Murcko)-
Source Versions-
Best Source Score-
Best Source Rank#-
Hinge Binder 4-Aminoquinazoline Hinge
InChIKey-
Filter PassYes
Retrosynthetic Analysis

Retrosynthetic analysis not yet run for this compound.

About

Retrosynthetic analysis decomposes the target molecule into purchasable building blocks using learned reaction templates.

A feasible route means the molecule can theoretically be synthesized from commercially available starting materials.

Min steps indicates the shortest synthesis route found.

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis

Find structural transformations that improve BBB penetration by analyzing pairs of similar molecules with different predictions.

About MMP

Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) are pairs of molecules that differ by a single structural transformation.

By comparing BBB predictions across many such pairs, we identify systematic SAR rules — specific modifications that consistently improve or reduce BBB penetration.

Suggestions are based on transformations observed in similar molecules within the compound library.

Patent Landscape Screening

Screen this compound against global patent databases (SureChEMBL + PubChem).

About IP Screening

Searches performed:

  • Exact structure match (SureChEMBL)
  • Substructure / Markush coverage
  • Similarity search (70% Tanimoto)
  • PubChem patent annotations

Risk levels:

  • CRITICAL Exact match in active patent
  • HIGH Substructure / Markush hit
  • MODERATE High similarity (>85%)
  • LOW Moderate similarity
  • CLEAR No hits found
Disclaimer: This is a computational screening tool only. It does not constitute legal advice. 18-month publication lag means recent filings may not appear. Consult qualified IP counsel for formal FTO opinions.