EGF-03060 Yellow

Cc1nc2c(N(Cc3ccccc3)S(=O)(=O)c3ccc(N4CCOCC4)nc3)cccc2n1CC1CC1
0.413
Platform Score
2D Structure
EGF-03060
C28H31N5O3S | Exact mass: 517.2148
Key Metrics
-5.7
Vina (kcal/mol)
#4619
Docking Rank
1
Hinge Binder
81
TPSA
518
MW
0
HBD
4.4
SlogP
Display Controls





EGFR Docking Result
-5.69
kcal/mol (molecular docking)
Docking Rank#4619 of 1,249
Consensus Score-
ReceptorEGFR (PDB: 1M17)
Selective No
Selectivity Profile
ADMET Profile
BBB (BOILED-Egg) BBB- (non-penetrant)
ADMET Status Pass (no hard fails)
CNS Drug-Likeness
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Weight517.70 Da
TPSA80.6 A^2
HBD0
HBA7
SlogP4.38
Fsp30.357
Rotatable Bonds8
Rings6 (4 aromatic)
QED0.345
SA Score2.69 (1=easy, 10=hard)
CNS MPO- / 4.0
FormulaC28H31N5O3S
Exact Mass517.2148
Classification
Scaffold (Murcko)-
Source Versions-
Best Source Score-
Best Source Rank#-
Hinge Binder 4-Aminoquinazoline Hinge
InChIKey-
Filter PassYes
Retrosynthetic Analysis

Retrosynthetic analysis not yet run for this compound.

About

Retrosynthetic analysis decomposes the target molecule into purchasable building blocks using learned reaction templates.

A feasible route means the molecule can theoretically be synthesized from commercially available starting materials.

Min steps indicates the shortest synthesis route found.

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis

Find structural transformations that improve BBB penetration by analyzing pairs of similar molecules with different predictions.

About MMP

Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) are pairs of molecules that differ by a single structural transformation.

By comparing BBB predictions across many such pairs, we identify systematic SAR rules — specific modifications that consistently improve or reduce BBB penetration.

Suggestions are based on transformations observed in similar molecules within the compound library.

Patent Landscape Screening

Screen this compound against global patent databases (SureChEMBL + PubChem).

About IP Screening

Searches performed:

  • Exact structure match (SureChEMBL)
  • Substructure / Markush coverage
  • Similarity search (70% Tanimoto)
  • PubChem patent annotations

Risk levels:

  • CRITICAL Exact match in active patent
  • HIGH Substructure / Markush hit
  • MODERATE High similarity (>85%)
  • LOW Moderate similarity
  • CLEAR No hits found
Disclaimer: This is a computational screening tool only. It does not constitute legal advice. 18-month publication lag means recent filings may not appear. Consult qualified IP counsel for formal FTO opinions.