BBP-06030 Yellow

Cc1cc(Nc2nc(N(C)c3c(F)cc(C4=CCN(C)CC4)cc3F)ncc2F)n[nH]1
0.513
Platform Score
2D Structure
BBP-06030
C21H22F3N7 | Exact mass: 429.1889
Key Metrics
-6.9
Vina (kcal/mol)
#2283
Docking Rank
1
Hinge Binder
73
TPSA
429
MW
2
HBD
4.2
SlogP
Display Controls





PLK4 Docking Result
-6.89
kcal/mol (molecular docking)
Docking Rank#2283 of 1,249
Consensus Score0.1907
ReceptorPLK4 (PDB: 4YUR)
Selective No
Selectivity Profile
ADMET Profile
BBB (BOILED-Egg) BBB+ (penetrant)
ADMET Status Pass (no hard fails)
hERG Risk pIC50 0.9 (low risk)
AMES MutagenicityNegative
Efflux Risk (P-gp) P-gp Substrate — likely effluxed at BBB. ER predicted >2.0
Intestinal Absorption High
3D PSA 43.8 A² (CNS-favorable)
MDCK Perm (predicted) -4.75 log Papp (good)
CYP3A4 InhibitorInhibitor
HepatotoxicityPositive
Flags: ["hepatotox_positive", "P-gp_substrate", "CYP3A4_inhibitor"]
CNS Drug-Likeness
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Weight429.45 Da
TPSA73.0 A^2
HBD2
HBA6
SlogP4.16
Fsp30.286
Rotatable Bonds5
Rings4 (3 aromatic)
QED0.635
SA Score3.21 (1=easy, 10=hard)
CNS MPO2.01 / 4.0
FormulaC21H22F3N7
Exact Mass429.1889
Classification
Scaffold (Murcko)C1CCC(C2CCC(CC3CCCC(CC4CCCC4)C3)CC2)CC1
Source Versionsv20,v25
Best Source Score0.8706
Best Source Rank#9
Hinge Binder Aminopyrazole DAD
InChIKeyDSKRWSQGCRBFPW-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Filter PassYes
Retrosynthetic Analysis

Retrosynthetic analysis not yet run for this compound.

About

Retrosynthetic analysis decomposes the target molecule into purchasable building blocks using learned reaction templates.

A feasible route means the molecule can theoretically be synthesized from commercially available starting materials.

Min steps indicates the shortest synthesis route found.

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis

Find structural transformations that improve BBB penetration by analyzing pairs of similar molecules with different predictions.

About MMP

Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) are pairs of molecules that differ by a single structural transformation.

By comparing BBB predictions across many such pairs, we identify systematic SAR rules — specific modifications that consistently improve or reduce BBB penetration.

Suggestions are based on transformations observed in similar molecules within the compound library.

Patent Landscape Screening

Screen this compound against global patent databases (SureChEMBL + PubChem).

About IP Screening

Searches performed:

  • Exact structure match (SureChEMBL)
  • Substructure / Markush coverage
  • Similarity search (70% Tanimoto)
  • PubChem patent annotations

Risk levels:

  • CRITICAL Exact match in active patent
  • HIGH Substructure / Markush hit
  • MODERATE High similarity (>85%)
  • LOW Moderate similarity
  • CLEAR No hits found
Disclaimer: This is a computational screening tool only. It does not constitute legal advice. 18-month publication lag means recent filings may not appear. Consult qualified IP counsel for formal FTO opinions.