BBP-18480 Red

COc1cc(Nc2cc(C3CC3)[nH]n2)cc(N2CCN(Cc3cccc(F)c3)CC2)n1
0.414
Platform Score
2D Structure
BBP-18480
C23H27FN6O | Exact mass: 422.223
Key Metrics
-7.0
Vina (kcal/mol)
#1845
Docking Rank
1
Hinge Binder
69
TPSA
423
MW
2
HBD
3.9
SlogP
Display Controls





PLK4 Docking Result
-7.04
kcal/mol (molecular docking)
Docking Rank#1845 of 1,249
Consensus Score0.2159
ReceptorPLK4 (PDB: 4YUR)
Selective No
Selectivity Profile
ADMET Profile
BBB (BOILED-Egg) BBB+ (penetrant)
ADMET Status Fail
hERG Risk pIC50 1.0 (low risk)
AMES MutagenicityNegative
Efflux Risk (P-gp) P-gp Substrate — likely effluxed at BBB. ER predicted >2.0
Intestinal Absorption High
3D PSA 49.6 A² (CNS-favorable)
MDCK Perm (predicted) -4.75 log Papp (good)
CYP3A4 InhibitorInhibitor
HepatotoxicityPositive
Flags: ["hERG_risk", "hepatotox_positive", "P-gp_substrate", "CYP3A4_inhibitor"]
CNS Drug-Likeness
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Weight422.51 Da
TPSA69.3 A^2
HBD2
HBA6
SlogP3.90
Fsp30.391
Rotatable Bonds7
Rings5 (3 aromatic)
QED0.602
SA Score2.60 (1=easy, 10=hard)
CNS MPO2.24 / 4.0
FormulaC23H27FN6O
Exact Mass422.223
Classification
Scaffold (Murcko)C1CCC(CC2CCC(C3CCCC(CC4CCC(C5CC5)C4)C3)CC2)CC1
Source Versionsv13
Best Source Score0.5837
Best Source Rank#297
Hinge Binder Aminopyrazole DAD
InChIKeyCQMGUCQYKYDPQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Filter PassYes
Retrosynthetic Analysis

Retrosynthetic analysis not yet run for this compound.

About

Retrosynthetic analysis decomposes the target molecule into purchasable building blocks using learned reaction templates.

A feasible route means the molecule can theoretically be synthesized from commercially available starting materials.

Min steps indicates the shortest synthesis route found.

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis

Find structural transformations that improve BBB penetration by analyzing pairs of similar molecules with different predictions.

About MMP

Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) are pairs of molecules that differ by a single structural transformation.

By comparing BBB predictions across many such pairs, we identify systematic SAR rules — specific modifications that consistently improve or reduce BBB penetration.

Suggestions are based on transformations observed in similar molecules within the compound library.

Patent Landscape Screening

Screen this compound against global patent databases (SureChEMBL + PubChem).

About IP Screening

Searches performed:

  • Exact structure match (SureChEMBL)
  • Substructure / Markush coverage
  • Similarity search (70% Tanimoto)
  • PubChem patent annotations

Risk levels:

  • CRITICAL Exact match in active patent
  • HIGH Substructure / Markush hit
  • MODERATE High similarity (>85%)
  • LOW Moderate similarity
  • CLEAR No hits found
Disclaimer: This is a computational screening tool only. It does not constitute legal advice. 18-month publication lag means recent filings may not appear. Consult qualified IP counsel for formal FTO opinions.